The All Mighty Green One

Non sense, whining and stupid unfounded comments from the green.

Lessons to Learn From the IPhone Keynote

The dust has settled. The larger than life keynote announcing the IPhone has ended, and the tech world is still trying to clean up it’s collective drool. While most of the stuff I’ve seen in the web is either stating that the IPhone will be Steve Job’s gift to the earth or the most horrible and destructive invention since the guillotine. Putting myself aside from the fanaticism (or at least making a good effort) if we take a step back and look at the keynote event, Job’s speech, and the promised features in the product, a lot can be learned and implemented in our daily business.

The keynote event itself was exceptional. Presentation was a key element. This comes to no surprise, Apple is well known for displaying top notch presentations year after year. Everything from the lighting, mac ad, movie/show clips, to the logistics of the show were beautiful orchestrated. Aside from the fact that some of the invited speakers are not as fluent as Jobs is another story, and sadly, something that is totally out of their control.

I want to make special mention to the technology being utilized to show in the projector the activities on the IPhone being used for the presentation. This isn’t a mind blowing concept. So they have some client/server application that is listening to all the events being fired on the phone’s UI and making an equivalent display on the projection. What’s the bid deal? The big deal is that without making a big fuss they solved a very important problem in presentations: third person view. In similar presentations, I am forced to watch a camera zoom in of a person utilizing the device himself. His hands (or whatever he may use to interface with the device) partially block my view of the device itself. This isn’t just solve the problem of “I can’t see the damn thing”, it also offers them a very subtle but important incentive: immersion. Immersion is that zen-like feeling you get when you are watching a movie and for a period of time, be it a split second, or the duration of the movie, you forget you are in your crappy life, and have full concentration in what is being presented. You are effectively in the movie, you are within it’s environment, it has your complete attention and you are solely interacting with it. Having the phone presented with no obstructions gave the audience and experience similar to what they would perceive if they were holding the phone itself. Someone is not pointing at the thing and showing it to you, you are experiencing it! This is a very important factor in convincing the journalists that assisted the event that not only should they report the invention as something that was worth purchasing, they want to get one as well.

The phone itself does not have any superficial technological marvels on the hardware side. I dare not speculate on the internal design of the device. The proximity, gyroscopic and ambient light sensors are not recent inventions by any extent. The device has other hardware related highlights, but I choose these since they are the most talked about features. Their beauty does not lie in the hype stating that these are state of the art concepts, and the mac crowd willfully believing it. Their beauty does not lie in that apple is the first one to implement these concepts. Some of these things probably exist on other existing portable devices in one way or another. Their beauty lies in that all of these feautres are put together in one package in a way which makes sense. You don’t have to remember to switch to horizontal view, it just does it. You don’t have to realize you are in the dark and can’t see the screen very well, it auto-adjusts. You will save your precious battery life, by making the screen go to low power mode will talking. That’s it. I love my current phone, but it’s inconvenient to have to switch photos from horizontal to vertical perspectives and vice-versa. To me, as a consumer, this not-such-a-big-deal feature is very appealing.

The phone runs OS X. We have no idea if it’s a mobile version of the OS, but it’s the most likely scenario. That means that all of the great applications (or faithful mobile versions) that have made mac users happy will be available. If you add into the equation the “free” services that will be thrown in from Google and Yahoo, and you have a very solid package. What does this mean? The user will not have a stripped down experience utilizing the phone and it’s features. Not text email, but HTML email. Not WAP, but www/html. Not minimalistic little applications, but the whole deal. You take away the sensation that you have to trade in the value of the software for mobility, and the product becomes very alluring.

The phone automatically syncs with your mac. This is probably one of the most important features. Since your contacts, your mail connection settings, your content… basically all valuable data will be transferred to your phone seamlessly, you achieve one of the most important things in this industry: You minimise or eradicate the fear of change. I’ve seen this over and over again. It’s one of the main problems that is stopping Linux distro’s from being ubiquitous on the desktop computer. Users are afraid of change. Even if you emulate their previous environment as close as possible (without violating any patents of course!), they still have that fear. Changing to a position where you are not sure what to do is discomforting. Especially if you come from a position where, after a lot of dedicated time and effort, you finally got a hang of what you are doing. This phone auto-magically sets itself up, and copies all your stuff over. The interface is very similar, so there nothing to worry about.

The genius behind multi-touch concept simply amazes me. Stop thinking about the technological side of it for a second. Analyze how babies and small children interact with the environment around them. When there is something new or different to them, they want to explore it with their senses to get acquainted with this alien object. One of the first instincts is to touch the new object. I know that a lot of accidents, funny stories and wrong doings may come to mind as well, but put them on the back-burner for a second. As you grow, you have some experiences which teach you not to feel so eager to touch everything you see. That doesn’t mean this necessity has vanished, you just restraining yourself from it. With the multi-touch, they are giving it back to you. Come on, touch it, it’s OK, that’s how it works! The gestures that make it work are natural gestures you would make in a similar situation. Slide your finger down to make it scroll, “pinch” it to make it bigger. One of my problems with the Opera browser’s gestures, is that you have to memorize the gesture-action library. They aren’t particularly natural or very mnemonic. I will admit it’s hard for them considering what the actions are, and that fact that your primary interface is a mouse. Nintendo has made great strides with this concept, first with the DS‘s stylus and touch screen, and now with the Wii‘s motion sensing controller.. Apple’s phone is a testament to how important it is to make device interface feel more natural.

Users are lazy. There is nothing you can do to change it. Instead of trying to change it, you need to realize this and utilize it to your advantage. The phone gives you instant gratification for just about everything you want to do with it. At least the features that they demoed in the keynote, one or two finger presses, and bam! You were there. Making calls, listening to a song, or looking up an address. No lag time was perceived on the interface. Users want their stuff and they want it now. I could go on about this, but I won’t be able to say anything more important than what I have already said.

I was inspired by these principals. Again, nothing revolutionary. Most of the ideas that have been employed are not well kept secrets. They’re public knowledge. The difference is that Apple took these principals, implemented them flawlessly, and set the bar to a new high. This is an excellent example of how to carter to the masses. I will definitely take these into account in the near future. Will you?


January 12, 2007 - Posted by | apple, technology


  1. I agree, the iPhone is a very interesting innovation, and it’s completely different from the offerings of: Sony, Motorola, or nokia.

    I think that we need to wait a bit before talking about implementation, –apple has drop the ball on the implementation camp more than a few times. It is just and also important to point out, that, they have actually solve, and compensated, it’s users every time they dropped the ball, being because of a design issue, implementation, or distribution.

    I feel this product will change things, and hopefully they will be for the better.

    I want to touch on the presentation, I didn’t see it in it’s entirety, so I will not judge it. How ever I would like to ask you, are you sure they solved the third person view issue?

    I know, what you are saying is true, I saw some of the presentation, and it was in sync, or at least, it seemed, it was in sync and that is my point. Just because it seemed,l does not mean it was.

    What ever it is they did to pull that off, let’s hope it becomes a trend because it is a good thing.


    Comment by monk | January 12, 2007

  2. Keep in mind that I’m talking about the spectator’s experience of the keynote, the features promised from the phone, and what was demoed.

    I agree with you, we don’t know for sure if they solved the “third person perspective” issue or not. According to me there are two options. They solved it, or they did not. If they did not, then they made a damn good simulation of it, which was good enough to implement the previously stated principals.

    Keep in mind, it’s the vibe, the experience of the presentation per se, that I am referring to. Not the technology/logistics behind the presentation. I mention them (and some theories as to how they were implemented) just as references.

    Comment by enmanuelr | January 12, 2007

  3. I’d like to hold one in my hands and decide if it’s world-changing or not. The interface is astonishing indeed, but will it allure customers as to make them buy one? We’re talking about US$600 for a cellphone gentlemen. Will the juice be worth the squeeze?

    Comment by Elvis Montero | January 14, 2007

  4. Very well put, and totally agree on your views of the keynote. I watched the entire thing last Saturday (thank you, bittorrent), and the balance between tech speak, user-friendliness and humor (the call to Starbucks was hilarious, as well as the first iPhone mock-up) was spot-on. I really wish I can someday have the ability to host presentations like that, with such cohesion, specially like he did, without really no visible notes (perhaps a teleprompter, I don’t know). Though I’ve never really cared or seen much about Steve Jobs, I have some new-found respect for him, if anything at least for his passion of technology and user friendliness. Even if Apple were to fail, I’m glad companies like Apple exists and move the industry in a positive way.

    There’s one odd thing, though. Why didn’t he showed the camera? The lens looks kind of small and not too capable, so I was hoping they would demoed it to clear my doubts. Sadly, it was never shown. But, considering their experience with iSight on the Macbooks, I’ll give them the benefit of the doubt.

    In my opinion, and as probably the only one here that hates laptops and was excited about Microsoft’s Origami Project (but later a bit disappointed), the iPhone looks to be my dream gadget, the one that I’ve wanted for so long. The price is not so bad considering all the things it does, the only gripe is that it’s currently tied to just one provider. Unlocked iPhones, meaning, no subsidy form a telco, probably will have prohibitive prices.

    Comment by nav1 | January 15, 2007

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: